Editorials

Reflecting the Views of the
United States Government

Text Only
Search Policy

 
U.S. On Iran's Nuclear Program

08 December 2006
U.S. On Iran's Nuclear Program (MP3) audio clip
U.S. On Iran's Nuclear Program (Real Player) - Download audio clip
Listen to U.S. On Iran's Nuclear Program (Real Player) audio clip

President George W. Bush says that the Iranian government knows what it has to do for the United States to engage it in direct negotiations:

"That is, to do what they said they would do, which is [to] verifiably suspend their enrichment programs. One of the concerns that I have about the Iranian regime is their desire to develop a nuclear weapon. . .The idea of this. . .regime having a nuclear weapon by which they could blackmail the world is unacceptable to free nations. And that's why we're working through the United Nations to send a clear message that the E-U-3 [Germany, Britain, and France], and the United States, Russia, and China do not accept their desires to have a nuclear weapon."

State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said that in and of itself "talking isn't a policy:"

"You have to actually. . .have a rational expectation that you can achieve something and that you have the conditions set for making progress whenever you engage in that kind of discussion. We have laid out a proposal, for example, on the nuclear front, where we believe that the conditions would be right to sit down with Iran in the context of the P-5+1 [Germany, Russia, China, Britain, France, and the United States], if they [the Iranian government] stopped all their enrichment-related and reprocessing- related activities."

Mr. McCormack says if that condition was met and such talks were to take place, a number of issues could be raised:

"The focus is the nuclear issue but. . .all the parties can raise various other issues, for example, human rights concerns about the way Iran treats its people, about its support for terrorism. Maybe they would have issues that they would want to raise vis-à-vis the United States or others in the P-5+1. That certainly is a possibility. So the possibility of talk exists."

But, says State Department spokesman Sean McCormack, "talk for talk's sake is not going to get anybody anywhere. It's not going to solve any of the problems."

The preceding was an editorial reflecting the views of the United States Government.

emailme.gif E-mail This Article
printerfriendly.gif Print Version
  Featured Editorial
Kyrgyzstan's Religious Law  Audio Clip Available

  Other Recent Editorials
Building A Palestinian State  Audio Clip Available
Jumpstarting The Global Economy  Audio Clip Available
Afghan Girls Of Courage  Audio Clip Available
Stalemate In Zimbabwe  Audio Clip Available
President Bush On Religious Freedom  Audio Clip Available
Better Health Care For Tajikistan  Audio Clip Available
Iran Tests More Missiles  Audio Clip Available
Sri Lanka Fights Aids  Audio Clip Available
U.S. - Kazakhstan Cooperation  Audio Clip Available
To The Rescue In Haiti  Audio Clip Available
Burma Intensifies Crackdown  Audio Clip Available
Passing The Presidential Torch  Audio Clip Available
More Economic Pressure On Iran  Audio Clip Available
Burma Jails Democracy Pro-Democracy Lawyers  Audio Clip Available
Crisis In The Congo  Audio Clip Available
Zimbabwe's Foreign Aid Raid  Audio Clip Available
PRC And Taiwan Make History  Audio Clip Available
Tragedy In Mexico  Audio Clip Available
America Honors National Service  Audio Clip Available
Misguided About Missile Defense  Audio Clip Available